Sunday, August 07, 2005

We've reached the final post of our Warner Oland salute
by Steve Rhodes. You can see Oland's second foray as
our favorite dectective in Charlie Chan in London and
discuss it at our Monday Night Chat at http://www.charliecha.info
from 8:00 P.M. to 10:00 P.M. (EDT) and we start watching
the movie at 8:30. I hope to see you there!
(This still is from Warner Oland's first Chan
movie, Charlie Chan Carries On, 1931;
courtesy of www.charliechan.info.)
* * *
Warner Oland Insights, part 6:
Final Curtain
by Steve Rhodes
(Courtesy of www.charliechan.net,
December 23, 2001)
Early August 1938. In Stockholm, Warner Oland was in hospital with bronchial pneumonia. He'd been a heavy smoker for years and perhaps this, combined with a climate change from Southern California to his birthplace in Northern Sweden, and a weakened physical condition, may have been too much. News of his serious illness made its way to his estranged wife back in the US and she prepared to leave for Sweden to be by his bedside. They'd been working on a reconciliation, it is said, prior to his departure for Europe. But at 3 P.M. Stockholm time on the 6th of August, in a Stockholm hospital, Warner Oland died. As he had said as Charlie Chan in CC in Egypt, "From Life to death is span of man." Warner's span was 58 years. (Keye Luke would later relate how Warner died in his mother's bed but, as comforting and poetic as that may be, the reality is that it was more likely in an oxygen tent in hospital.) Back in Hollywood, the Fox "B" unit was shocked by the news that their Charlie Chan was dead. Sol Wurtzel gave the crew the rest of the day off out of respect for Warner.
Edith Oland continued to prepare for her trip to Sweden but it as now to see to the return of her husband's remains to the US and to tidy up the considerable loose ends on both sides of the Atlantic.
Warner Oland had made his final will and testament on the 11th of May, 1937. In that he left all his worldly goods to his wife, "Edith Shearn Oland." In the will, the amount of $50,000 was the estimate of the value of said worldly goods. (But how does theis relatively small amount sit with the "1000 acres on the Mexican island, house in Massachusetts, buildings and acreage on the coast near Santa Barbara . . ."? Or her own property?) The estate was eventually assessed for probate at $46,527.72.
Provision was made in the will for his relatives back East and here we get a glimpse of the Oland clan as it stood in 1937. Firstly they are all refereed to as "Oland." It seems the whole family had adopted the spelling in the US, not just Warner for "showbiz" purposes. (Later death records for these relatives confirms the spelling, so it wasn't just a clerical assumption in an LA law office.) In the event of Edith having died before the will came into effect, it was Oland's intention to distribute the legacy to: "Carl O. [G?] Oland, brother, 80 Niland Street, Hartford, Conneticut." "Carl Warner Oland, nephew (minor), same address." "Albert A. Oland, brother, Ewan, New Jersey" and nephew and nieces Paul, Elinore and Margaret Oland, Ewan, New Jersey." In the event of Edith being still living then these relatives were to receive $1,000 each.
Meanwhile, back in Stockholm, Edith arrived to take charge of matters. She stayed at the Grand Hotel in Stockholm and it was to here there that a Swedish bank wrote requesting she settle the matter of Warner's overdrawn cheque account, in the amount of 190 Kroner.
She arranged for Warner's cremation and the shipment of his ashes back to New York. (That she didn't take the ashes back personally is inferred by a charge of 225 Kroner by the Swedish undertaker, for shipment to New York.) She cabled Boston lawyer Harrison Schaff to arrange a cemetery plot and he did so acquiring lot 51 of Block 10 into the Southborough Cemetery in Mass. for $50, with an extra $100 for perpetual care of same. The ashes arrived and the size of the burial ceremony may be deduced from the invoice from Gregg and Sons Funeral Directors, all of $25.
On arriving back in Hollywood, she had to, as Warner's nominated executrix of his estate, have to start sorting through the claims that started to roll in. Jack Gardner, his agent and to whose home he had gone after leaving Edith, made a claim for $17,000 and in company with his wife, Louise, and further claim for $900 [sic]. (Had they been counting every sardine Warner ate at their home?!) Edith rejected the claim. They sued. She settled for about $1200 total. Another curious claim came from Catherine F. Ryan. Yes, the "nurse/secretary" referred to in several sources. She had accompanied Warner to residence in the Gardner household, and now claimed $1193.17. She got it in the final probate settlement. We can only speculate on what the basis of that claim was since it is inferred by all sources that she was a studio employee. Other claims were paid to "The Orient" (unspecified entity), for $664.05 and to someone called Vernon Snively for $110. (Why does that name inspire instant dislike?!)
Another disputed claim was by a Dr. Eugene Jacques Usukor (sp.?) for $925. Edith refused, the Doc sued, they settled on $400. Then the lawyers jumped in for a couple of thousands for services rendered.
All this took until early '41 to settle. Thankfully Warner was past caring. Time passed, some of those nieces and nephews eventually lived and died in LA themselves. Edith, the tough little old Bostonian, died aged 98 in 1968. Milton, the loyal chauffeur, in 1980.
So why did Warner make so effective a Charlie Chan? To me, after thisresearch, it was because he was himself a philosopher, a foreigner adapting culturally and liguistically to a new land and a gentle soul in a hard world. Warner, wherever ya are, take a bow.
The end.
Steve
(This is from Warner Oland's last movie,
Charlie Chan in Monte Carlo, 1937;
courtesy of www.charliechan.info.)

1 Comments:

Blogger jorn52ofdf said...

St0ck For Your Review - FCPG

Current Profile
Faceprint Global Solutions (FCPG)
Current Price $0.15


A U.S. based-company dedicated to the goal of
bringing effective security solutions to the marketplace.

With violent and white-collar terrorism on the rise,
companies are starving for innovative security solutions.

FCPG is set to bring hot new security solutions to
the industry, with currently over 40 governmental and
non-governmental contracts, being negotiated.

Please Review Exactly What this Company Does.

Why consider Faceprint Global Solutions (FCPG)?

Faceprint Global Solutions (FCPG) holds the exclusive
marketing rights from Keyvelop, to sell the world�s
leading encryption technology to be distributed directly
to the Healthcare industry in North America.

Faceprint Global Solutions has completed its biometric
software that recognizes facial features of individuals
entering and leaving through airports, ship yards, banks,
large buildings, etc.

FCPG acquired Montreal-based Apometrix Technologies,
which enhances the companies mission of being a
full-service provider to the multi-application smart
card industry. The North American market appears ready
for significant expansion of price-competitive, proven,
multi-application solutions on smart cards. Apometrix's
forecast of over 300 customers and sales of more than $50
million in North America over the next five years, appears
very realistic, according to company management.

Faceprint Global Solutions is currently in contract negotiations
with over 40 governmental agencies and businesses seeking to use
their encryption, biometric, and smart-card technologies.

Breaking News for Faceprint Global Solutions (FCPG)

Faceprint Global Solutions (FCPG) is pleased to announce that
IBM will now offer the world�s leading encryption software to
its major Healthcare clients in North America.

With FCPG owning the exclusive North American rights to distribute
the worlds leading encryption and transmission software developed by
Keyvelop, FCPG is poised to capture large volumes of sales generated
by customers currently using IBM�s software in the healthcare and other industries.
�This is a very positive move for FCPG and for Keyvelop,� said FCPG
CEO Pierre Cote. �We are very happy about the decision to go with IBM.
This is a continuation of the progress made by everyone associated
with FCPG and its partners.�

Buell Duncan, IBM's general manager of ISV & Developer Relations commented,
�Collaborating with Keyvelop will ensure that we develop open solutions
that are easy to maintain and cost effective for our customers in the
healthcare and life sciences industry.�

Among other things, this new software technology which is currently
being used by a number of European healthcare companies, is used to
send any file, regardless of format or size. Encryption keys, evidence
of transmission integrity with fingerprint calculation, time-stamping
of all actions and status record updating, pre-checking sender and
receiver identities, validating file opening dates are part of Keyvelop features.
About FacePrint Global Solutions, Inc.

FCPG operates a business, which develops and delivers a variety of
technology solutions, including biometric software applications on
smart cards and other support mediums (apometric solutions). FCPG�s
products provide biometric solutions for identity authentication and a
host of smart card- and biometrics-related hardware peripherals and
software applications. Apometrix, FCPG�s wholly-owned subsidiary, combines
on-card or in-chip multi-application management solutions with best-of-breed
�in-card matching� biometrics. Keyvelop�s secure digital envelope solution
and Apometrix�s on-card biometrics work together to produce the winning
combination in the fields of security, traceability and identity management.
Conclusion:

The examples above show the Awesome, Earning Potential of little known
Companies That Explode onto Investor�s Radar Screens. This sto,ck will
not be a Secret for long. Then You May Feel the Desire to Act Right Now!
And Please Watch This One Trade!

GO FCPG!

Disclaimer:
Information within this email contains "forwardlooking statements" within
the meaning of Section 27Aof the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements that express or involve
discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs,
plans, projections, objectives, goals, assumptions or future events or
performance are not statements of historical fact and may be "forward
looking statements". "Forward |ooking statements" are based on
expectations, estimates and projections at the time the statements are made
that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual
results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated.
We were paid a sum of three thousand USD to disseminate this information from
ir marketing. Forward loking statements in this action may be identified through
the use of words such as "projects", "foresee", "expects", "will", "anticipates",
"estimates", "believes", "understands" or that by statements indicating
certain actions "may", "could", or "might" occur. Risk factors include
general economic and business conditions, the ability to acquire and develop
specific projects, the ability to fund operations and changes in consumer
and business consumption habits and other factors overwhich the company has
little or no control. The publisher of this newsletter does not represent
that the information contained herein are true and correct.

18/8/05 12:16 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home